• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Andrew Walsh - Librarian and History Author

  • Home
  • My Work and Experience
  • Blog

How to Fact-Check AI-Generated Information Using Lateral Reading

September 10, 2026 by Andrew Walsh

A little while back I shared the AI Research Tips video series I’ve been working on at Sinclair, and linked the video I did on topic selection with AI (plus your own ideas).

My next video was a collaboration with Sinclair’s AI Excellence Institute, which I’ve enjoyed getting the chance to work with on a few projects including serving as an external reviewer for some of the AI literacy modules they are creating, and participating in their pilot for paid AI tools.

The video is titled “How to Check AI Sources” and I bring in

How to Fact-Check an AI Overview: 3 Questions to Ask

My second video addresses another key issue: how to determine whether information provided by AI tools is accurate and trustworthy.

Rather than treating AI Overviews as a single source, I encourage students to think of its output as a synthesis of many underlying sources, which can be a wide range of sources and viewpoints.

That shift in mindset helps reinforce the need to verify claims by consulting those original sources directly.

The video introduces the concept of lateral reading, a research strategy that involves quickly checking multiple sources to evaluate credibility and context.

The sources themselves might be they might be news articles, academic studies, advocacy group websites, or even they could be user generated social media content. (In the video I show a Reddit post showing up as an AI citation.)

Beyond the individual sources, AI tools also often give you clean bullet points, but there’s no guarantee that they’re actually the most important aspects of the topic.

So look for what might be missing. Are important considerations or trade offs being left out?

Most published research deals with more specific questions, so overviews can compress a complex issue into a simple yes or no or good or bad summary.

Sometimes an overview will be technically accurate, but it leaves out key context needed to interpret it.

So your prompting strategies can help with this too, in addition to the lateral reading strategies.

Watch the full video here:

Filed Under: Academic Librarianship, AI and Librarians, Evaluating Sources Tagged With: Generative AI, Google

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Academic Librarianship (19)
  • AI and Librarians (8)
  • Dayton Activities/Events (2)
  • Digital Productivity (10)
  • Evaluating Sources (18)
  • Library History (7)
  • Local History (15)
  • Open Education (8)
  • Presentations (11)
  • Rare Books/Special Collections (3)
  • Technology (56)
  • Urbanism (6)
  • Writing (12)

Recent Posts

  • How to Fact-Check AI-Generated Information Using Lateral Reading
  • New Project: Claude for Analyzing Academic Library Data, Measuring Impact
  • New Video Series: Built to Last in Dayton
  • Career Competencies and What I Learned at the NACE Conference
  • What Was the First Social Media Platform? History of the Earliest Networking Sites
  • Upcoming Talk on Dayton Industrial History at the Dayton Arcade
  • Summer Series of Lunchtime Dayton Walking Tours

Tags

Academic Research Amazon Apple Blogging Business ChatGPT Copyright Databases Dayton Dayton Arcade Dropbox eBooks Email Evernote Facebook Flow/Focus Generative AI Goals Google Habits Higher Education Information Literacy iPad Kindle Mexico Microsoft Misinformation Podcasts Privacy Publishing Search Engines Security Sinclair College Smartphones Social Media Student Success Tablets Textbooks Video Creation Web Browsers Web Hosting Website Creation Wikipedia WordPress YouTube

Recent Comments

  • Judge Truth on Standalone GPS vs. Google Maps or Waze on Smartphone: Which to Use?
  • Mr. Irritable on Standalone GPS vs. Google Maps or Waze on Smartphone: Which to Use?

Copyright © 2026 · Author Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in